The Sandbox

GWOT hot wash, straight from the wire

Welcome to The Sandbox, a forum for service members who have served or are currently serving in Iraq and Afghanistan, returned vets, spouses and caregivers. The Sandbox's focus is not on policy and partisanship (go to our Blowback page for that), but on the unclassified details of deployment -- the everyday, the extraordinary, the wonderful, the messed-up, the absurd. All correspondence is read, and as much as possible is posted, lightly edited. If you know someone who is deployed who might have something to say, please tell them about us. To submit a post click here.

DECEPTIVELY SATISFYING |

May 04, 2011

Name: Old Blue
Returned from: Afghanistan
Milblog: Afghan Quest

If your understanding of our mission in Afghanistan was that the entire operation was to capture or kill bin Laden, then it will seem as if the mission has been accomplished. All of our problems have been solved. Finis.

Closure? Ummm…

Not that the death of bin Laden isn’t a good thing. The monster is dead -- or is it? I have often said that bin Laden was a poster child, a lightning rod for those who share his world view. Those people are still alive. All of the pieces that have been assembled over the years are still in place. I’m sure that morale is currently low and anger is correspondingly high. Bin Laden was, indeed, more than just a poster child. But he was obviously not exerting the same degree of command and control that he had at one time. Al Qaeda was still plugging away, doing the things that al Qaeda does.

What does this mean to Afghanistan? Well, I’m sure that morale is higher amongst the troops. My morale is higher -- in a way. The question of whether or not this is a game-changer remains to be seen. Is this going to change what the local insurgent commander or shadow provincial governor in Afghanistan does? Probably not. This is waaay above his pay grade.

I’ve had the opportunity to speak with a lot of Afghans about bin Laden. They never viewed him as being their main problem. Sure, bin Laden supported the Taliban. Al Qaeda funded, recruited, equipped, trained and fielded a “brigade” that fought against the Northern Alliance in the years prior to 9/11. That much we know. Al Qaeda and bin Laden were shielded from the rest of the world and provided for by the Taliban when the Taliban controlled most of Afghanistan. In recent years, al Qaeda wound up with better relations with the Haqqani network than they did with the Quetta Shura Taliban. At least it appeared so. Admittedly, al Qaeda’s actual presence in Afghanistan was limited to a couple of hundred individuals. Afghans have more immediate problems with people who do intend to stay there and rule them, such as Gulbuddin and Mullah Omar.

I don’t think that the death of bin Laden is a game-changer in Afghanistan.

External support for the Taliban and/or their affiliates may suffer in some way, but I’m in no way convinced that this will be disabling to the Taliban, et al, in any meaningful way. It does not change the threat to Afghanistan from the Taliban, Haqqani and Hizbi Islami Gulbuddin (HiG). Nor does it defeat the criminal patronage networks. It does not magically improve the capability of the Government of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan (GIRoA). The degradation of even al Qaeda remains to be seen.

The many Afghans I had the opportunity to speak with over the years I’ve spent in Afghanistan expressed concern that if we ever did catch up with bin Laden that it would be to the detriment of Afghanistan. Already, there are calls in Congress to abandon Afghanistan. While this is predictable, it is shallow and short-sighted. These calls have been coming from a not insignificant group for some time.

Once the complexity and difficulty of Afghanistan became clear, the “good war” came under fire. Most of us who were personally involved in Afghanistan while it was still the “forgotten, good war” (as opposed to the “bad war” in Iraq), knew that the goodwill towards Afghanistan would wane as the nature of the conflict proceeded to baffle the minds of the ill-informed and idealistic. Now there is a more plausible reason to declare victory and abandon Afghanistan to its fate, as if it will never again influence the world it is a part of. This opportunity to cut and run will not be wasted, and it will likely gain adherents rather than lose them.

It boils down to the struggle between two schools of thought. One contends that the world hates us (particularly Muslims), and that they have good reason to. This school believes that withdrawal and accommodation will assuage this hatred. This school of thought argues that instability does not impact other nations, and certainly is not a threat to the national security of more developed countries.

The other school of thought agrees that instability, in a globalized world that is only getting smaller, has the demonstrated ability to provide festering grounds for non nation-state actors who are now capable of exporting violence on a scale that was formerly the realm of nation-states. Japan used six aircraft carriers and over 400 planes to cause a similar number of American dead in the attacks on Pearl Harbor; this compared to four aircraft-cum-cruise missiles acquired for the price of a few airline tickets on 9/11. That was not the last attack, nor has Afghanistan been the only country to harbor such plotters. But we have seen what “leaving Afghanistan to its fate” has accomplished for us.

Predicting the future is impossible. Could the “Mission Accomplished” crowd be right? I don’t have a crystal ball, but I don’t agree with them. So my answer is, “No.” What we have done in the past was not successful.

So what does the death of bin Laden mean?

It means that we have had some measure of revenge. We have had some resolution for part of our anger. We have cut the head off the snake, and whether that snake is a hydra or a cobra remains to be seen. Many insurgent leaders have been killed in Afghanistan, only to be replaced by less reticent commanders who were more brutal than the ones who we killed. Will that happen with al Qaeda? Only time will tell. We cannot predict that.

More damage may be done to al Qaeda by the “Arab Spring” uprisings in the Middle East than by the death of bin Laden. Al Qaeda has called for uprisings against the regimes in power for years. Al Qaeda wished to inspire general uprisings based upon Islamic rage, not upon the principles of personal liberty and government accountability. The uprisings of the past few weeks in the Middle East were not at all what al Qaeda and bin Laden wished to inspire. If regime changes in the Middle East replace repressive regimes with an opportunity for hope, the very hopeless rage that drives young men into the arms of al Qaeda will come unglued. The death of bin Laden is icing on that cake.

The final results of the Arab uprisings in the Middle East are far from clear. This could still all go horribly awry. The United States has an opportunity to support the development of enduring institutions, non-military institutions, in these countries. In our recent history, our first answer has been to provide military assistance. But the lack of responsive, accountable institutions has been a key factor driving the disaffected to seek solutions to their problems that often wound up being religiously driven. Who can save you from hopelessness? God. Whatever name to use to refer to God, when the world is too big and too hard, many seek explanations and solutions from religious leaders. Christians have had many such as Jim Jones and David Koresh. Muslims have had such leaders as well, and those who find themselves seeking solutions to the intractable problems of their world are drawn to them. Bin Laden counted on these people as his recruiting base.

What happens if this base suddenly gains hope from another source? What happens if they create and sustain institutions that provide accountability and responsiveness? What happens if the governments and economies of these countries begin to offer opportunities and hope? Bin Laden was already beginning to lose his appeal. Now that he is dead, his survivors in al Qaeda will have to deal with this lost traction.

Our struggle remains with competing visions of our role in the post-Cold War world. The death of bin Laden does not end that argument, but will add artificial lubricant to the side which espouses self-centered navel gazing above striving to find a productive way to add to stability in a shrinking world.

Comments

Well said! A thoughtful, measured, balanced response from an individual from whom many might foolishly expect rabid, "gung-ho" thoughtlessness, concerning your literal, boots-on-the-ground creds. Thank you for this.

The big problem is leading the horse to water. So far the government we empowered is running by the third world standards of tribalism and tribute instead of a government for and by the people. It appears that we have not made any significant progress. On the other hand, many would say that our foreign policy has always been tied to economics which embodies the golden rule of "Them that has the gold makes the rules". As you alluded human have flaws and people look to God to punish and hand out justice. Too bad many of the clerics have also cashed in / poisoned the well. Somehow we still find peace and solace in family, nature and the arts.
Vietnam '68

wow! that's really amazing mission in Afgan. that's very dramatic situation outta there.

so pretty.You are a good teacher. Lucky student!

Lisez votre article sentez que votre criture trs vrai, bien que trs bon, facile comprendre! En esprant vous voir la prochaine fois que les uvres.

Absolutely. Sometimes, the best practice of writing for me is to write a blog memory - it loosens the joints, so to speak. I would do well to remember this more often ...

well this blog is great i love reading your articles.

If you discover, Soft Drink's promoting and advertising is only the development potential . connected with insinuated assault Coca-Cola, then this whenever, Pop was regarded as completely torn [url=http://www.airjordan8viii.com/]nike air jordan 8[/url] over goggles can probably be said, due to Coca-Cola retaliated stunning bayonet can charge."Savor test" a trick through Coca-Cola executives an impact fright. Immediately after discussion, they believe the tongue pertaining to Coca-Cola has cannot satisfy the general's with regard to food that you should the hot release, plus chose to alter the ancient picture, the Coca-Cola's clean step-up.

Did not search for, air jordanCo delivered attacking additionally brand-new ad. Advert first added now: "Why Should You the actual criteria within order to Coca-Cola?" And Also, this beginning [url=http://www.airjordan8viii.com/air-jordan-8-max-c-70.html]Air Jordan 8 Max[/url] some sort of litttle lady, rife with hopelessness as well as described: "The Company personal preference needs transformed." Next, real estate young girl hanging every wine using Pop, that coffee one specific , the girl mentioned, all of made: "Goodness Me, it's true that!" Tactic typical Pop advertising, not really just even more the point potential buyer team pattern a character, and constitutes a large numbers of a unique Coca-Cola brand name content has always been so , who forwarded to your guy.

The Entire Kosovo combat, Coke with Coca-Cola comes equipped with like a obtained most of the similar's viewers scenario, Steele the specific truck people just like a initial us president ture of Pop renowned decide.Present, with the "Zero-Above Market Other Legal System" protection introduced, utilization of its Soda commercials are extremely [url=http://www.airjordan8viii.com/retro-jordan-8-c-18.html]Retro Jordan 8[/url] offensive far, has been banned. Nevertheless the strike at ads ought not to be dismissed by just providers. In, this specific stop announcements could be paid it is in the conditions concerning very low amount to obtain competitors, some of the imperfections nor insufficiencies, and afterwards learn how to regain their cash governing the best anti --colleagues tool.

Because the world's oldest sports, air jordan's strategy into China come july 1st only has just started. Including small cloth, Hamilton, air jordan signed numerous players, including China's http://www.airjordan8viii.com/retro-jordan-12-c-22.htmlgoal is not to advertise these shoes, but to China to attend a number of training camps. However, these players for almost all fans have also demonstrated the latest model of jordans shoes, for example "uptempo Series", "hyperize Series", "Jordan series," and air jordan's retro casual style. But as a leader, how will Big Brother's air jordan promote sneakers in China missed a good chance? http://www.airjordan8viii.com/ They sent a Bryant like a "vanguard Great General."Kobe in China along with getting involved in this number of "disciples activities"

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c5f3053ef014e883bd205970d

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference DECEPTIVELY SATISFYING:

« Previous Article | Main | Next Article »




Search Doonesbury Sandbox Blog

LINKS


About

My Photo

FEATURED BOOK